内容简介:This is just a brief note about something that I came to realise recently. I've been working a lot with UTF-8 byte streams, Unicode characters, and all that, and I've come to realise that writing them out in hexadecimal is completely wrong. It's a form of
Write out Unicode in Octal
This is just a brief note about something that I came to realise recently. I've been working a lot with UTF-8 byte streams, Unicode characters, and all that, and I've come to realise that writing them out in hexadecimal is completely wrong. It's a form of obfuscation.
I'll walk through an example, which should explain very quickly why I feel we should be using octal. Take the Unicode codepoint U+2B776, which has this UTF-8 encoding in hexadecimal:
| 0x2B776 | F0 | AB | 9D | B6 |
|---|
Obviously, right? This is the same thing in octal:
| 0533566 | 360 | 253 | 235 | 266 |
|---|
The first octal digit of a leading byte is 3, of a continuation byte is 2, and of an ASCII byte is 1 or 0. We only really need to worry about the other digits. Now, compare the other digits of each continuation byte with the octal of the codepoint.
| 0533566 | 360 | 2 53 | 2 35 | 2 66 |
|---|
Well, that's pretty straightforward. This is because the lower six bits of a UTF-8 byte contain the whole of the value contributed to the codepoint, and each octal digit represents three bits, so two octal digits hold this value exactly.
What about the leading byte? Okay, that's slightly trickier, although still easier than it would be in hexadecimal. As well as contributing a few bits to the codepoint, a leading byte also indicates how many bytes are expected to be in this codepoint (the others of which will be continuation bytes).
So here are the rules, given a leading byte 3xx(in octal):
- If the middle digit is < 4 (i.e. 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 ) then we count it, as we would in a continuation byte.
- Otherwise (i.e. 4 , 5 , 6 ) we count only the last digit, but if the middle digit is 5 (i.e. is odd) then a 1 comes first.
You can often get away without knowing what the length of the sequence should be, but if you have to know then just look at the middle digit: 0-3 is 2-byte, 4-5 is 3-byte, and 6 is 4-byte.
With a little practice these are easy to learn. Much easier than learning the hexadecimal ones. Here are some examples, taken from Wikipedia (where they're written out in hexadecimal, making them a lot harder to read).
| 044 | 044 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0242 | 3 02 | 2 42 | ||
| 020254 | 34 2 | 2 02 | 2 54 | |
| 0201510 | 36 0 | 2 20 | 2 15 | 2 10 |
Edit— By request, here is an extra example of 35x .
| 0120254 | 35 2 | 2 02 | 2 54 |
|---|
I can now quite happily read UTF-8 sequences as Unicode codepoints in my head (something I had to do a lot of while working on a UTF-8 library), and with a little thought can write out codepoints in UTF-8 too. But only in octal! If I had to do it in hexadecimal then I wouldn't have a clue.
So please, to make things easier on us humans, write out Unicode in octal .
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作能带来一定的帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
精通CSS(第2版)
[英] Andy Budd、[英] Simon Collison、[英] Cameron Moll / 陈剑瓯 / 人民邮电出版社 / 2010-5 / 49.00元
本书汇集了最有用的CSS技术,介绍了CSS的基本概念和最佳实践,结合实例探讨了图像、链接和列表的操纵,还有表单设计、数据表格设计、纯CSS布局等核心CSS技术。此外,书中着眼于创建跨浏览器的技术,讨论了bug及其捕捉和修复技术,还将所有技术组合成两个精彩的实例,讲述这些技术的工作原理和实际用法。 本书适合具有HTML和CSS基础知识的读者阅读。一起来看看 《精通CSS(第2版)》 这本书的介绍吧!