Should there be a standard C++ pattern for this? transform_to

栏目: IT技术 · 发布时间: 6年前

内容简介:February 28th, 2020I’ve got one type of collection and I want to apply a function to each member of the collection, thereby producing a new collection.Surely there’s a standard pattern for this?
Should there be a standard C++ pattern for this? transform_to

Raymond

February 28th, 2020

I’ve got one type of collection and I want to apply a function to each member of the collection, thereby producing a new collection.

Surely there’s a standard pattern for this?

In JavaScript, it’s called map :

function getOldValues()
{
    return ["a", "b", "c", "d"];
}

var newValues = getOldValues().map(v => v.charCodeAt(0));
// result: [97, 98, 99, 100]

In C#, it’s Select .

string[] GetOldValues() => new[] { "a", "b", "c", "d" };

var newValues = GetOldValues().Select(v => (int)v[0]).ToArray();
// result: int[] { 97, 98, 99, 100 };

In C++, it’s, um, this clumsy std::transform .

std::vector<std::string> GetOldValues()
{
   return { "a", "b", "c", "d" };
}

auto oldValues = GetOldValues();
auto newValues = std::vector<int>(oldValues.size());
std::transform(oldValues.begin(), oldValues.end(),
    std::back_inserter(newValues),
    [](auto&& v) { return v[0]; });

It’s clumsy because you need to give a name to the thing being transformed, because you need to call both begin and end on it. But giving it a name extends its lifetime, so you end up carrying this oldValues vector around for no reason.¹

It’s clumsy because you have to construct an empty newValues and then fill it in.

Would be nice if there were some helper function like

template<typename T, typename U, typename TLambda>
T transform_to(U&& u, TLambda&& lambda)
{
  T result;
  if constexpr (has_size_v<U> && has_reserve_v<T>)
  {
    result.reserve(u.size());
  }
  std::transform(u.begin(), u.end(), std::back_inserter(result),
                 std::forward<TLambda>(lambda));
  return result;
}

auto newValues = std::transform_to<std::vector<int>>(
    GetOldValues(), [](auto&& v) { return v[0]; });

Maybe one exists and I’m missing it? Help me out here.

¹ You can avoid extending the lifetime beyond the transform by pushing it into a lambda:

auto newValues = [&]()
{
    auto oldValues = GetOldValues();
    auto newValues = std::vector<int>(oldValues.size());
    std::transform(oldValues.begin(), oldValues.end(),
        std::back_inserter(newValues),
        [](auto&& v) { return v[0]; });
    return newValues;
}();

but that’s basically just taking the transform_to function and inlining it as a lambda.


以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《Should there be a standard C++ pattern for this? transform_to》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!

查看所有标签

本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们

Designing with Web Standards (2nd Edition)

Designing with Web Standards (2nd Edition)

Jeffrey Zeldman / Peachpit Press / 2006-07-06 / USD 44.99

Best-selling author, designer, and web standards evangelist Jeffrey Zeldman has updated his classic, industry-shaking guidebook. This new edition--now in full color--covers improvements in best prac......一起来看看 《Designing with Web Standards (2nd Edition)》 这本书的介绍吧!

XML 在线格式化
XML 在线格式化

在线 XML 格式化压缩工具

RGB CMYK 转换工具
RGB CMYK 转换工具

RGB CMYK 互转工具

HEX CMYK 转换工具
HEX CMYK 转换工具

HEX CMYK 互转工具